tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4157947745696490453.post5039915844395481073..comments2023-02-12T01:47:05.141+01:00Comments on Ordning och anarki: Om jordens eventuella undergångCarl Jakobssonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10123056454725167900noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4157947745696490453.post-37996577111959950022008-09-11T22:54:00.000+02:002008-09-11T22:54:00.000+02:00Likadant när atomklyvning var nytt:Teller also rai...Likadant när atomklyvning var nytt:<BR/><BR/><I>Teller also raised the speculative possibility that an atomic bomb might "ignite" the atmosphere, because of a hypothetical fusion reaction of nitrogen nuclei. Bethe calculated, according to Serber, that it could not happen. In his book The Road from Los Alamos, Bethe says a refutation was written by Konopinski, C. Marvin, and Teller as report LA-602, showing that ignition of the atmosphere was impossible, not just unlikely.[7] In Serber's account, Oppenheimer mentioned it to Arthur Compton, who "didn't have enough sense to shut up about it. It somehow got into a document that went to Washington" which led to the question being "never laid to rest".</I><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Project" REL="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Project</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com